翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ United States v. National Treasury Employees Union
・ United States v. Navajo Nation
・ United States v. Navajo Nation (2009)
・ United States v. Nice
・ United States v. Ninety-Five Barrels Alleged Apple Cider Vinegar
・ United States v. Nixon
・ United States v. Nosal
・ United States v. O'Brien
・ United States v. O'Hagan
・ United States v. O'Hara
・ United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers' Cooperative
・ United States v. Olano
・ United States v. Olofson
・ United States v. One Book Called Ulysses
・ United States v. One Package of Japanese Pessaries
United States v. Oppenheimer
・ United States v. Oregon
・ United States v. Ortiz
・ United States v. Pace
・ United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.
・ United States v. Park
・ United States v. Parke, Davis & Co.
・ United States v. Patane
・ United States v. Paul
・ United States v. Payner
・ United States v. Peoni
・ United States v. Perez
・ United States v. Peters
・ United States v. Peters (1795)
・ United States v. Phellis


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

United States v. Oppenheimer : ウィキペディア英語版
United States v. Oppenheimer

''United States v. Oppenheimer'', 242 U.S. 85 (1916), was a landmark Supreme Court decision applying the common law concept of ''res judicata'' (literally: the thing is decided) to criminal law cases.
==Prior history ==

On error from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York:
The defendant and others were indicted for a conspiracy to conceal assets from a trustee in bankruptcy. The defendant Oppenheimer set up a previous adjudication upon a former indictment for the same offense that it was barred by the one-year statute of limitations in the bankruptcy act for offenses against that act; an adjudication since held to be wrong in another case. This defense was presented in four forms entitled respectively, demurrer, motion to quash, plea in abatement, and plea in bar. After motion by the Government that the defendant be required to elect which of the four he would stand upon he withdrew the last-mentioned two, and subsequently the court granted what was styled the motion to quash, ordered the indictment quashed and discharged the defendant without day. The Government brings this writ of error treating the so-called motion to quash as a plea in bar, which in substance it was. 〔

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「United States v. Oppenheimer」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.